Files
Docs/en/for-regulators.md

110 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

**Language:** [English](../en/for-regulators.md) | [Русский](../ru/for-regulators.md)
---
# Cooperation Proposal Within a Regulatory Sandbox
**From:** VC HB3 Accelerator
**To:** Authority responsible for digital asset regulation
**Subject:** Deployment of blockchain infrastructure with participant identification within the jurisdiction
---
## 1. Context
FATF recommendations (Travel Rule, 2023 update), EU MiCA Regulation (in force 30.12.2024), and practice of VARA (UAE) and SEC/CFTC (USA) establish a common requirement: digital asset operations must be linked to identified parties.
According to World Bank and SSRN data as of January 2025, 199 regulatory sandboxes exist in 92 countries. 70% of them focus on blockchain and fintech. However, in most jurisdictions the basic infrastructure needed to meet these requirements is missing:
- no blockchain registries linked to national legal entity identifiers;
- no monitoring tools (blockchain scanners) for supervisors;
- no venues for controlled testing of blockchain solutions with real business;
- no protocols for data exchange between registries of different jurisdictions.
---
## 2. Proposal
VC HB3 Accelerator proposes to deploy blockchain infrastructure with support for national identifiers within the jurisdiction under a regulatory sandbox.
The fund will:
- register a presence in an IT hub / special economic zone;
- integrate national identifiers (tax, accounting, banking, registration) into the software platform;
- deploy blockchain registry and scanner on servers located within the jurisdiction;
- attract participants (entrepreneurs, contractors, investors) through the accelerator program.
**From the regulator:** grant funding for opening the presence and provide lists of national identifiers for integration.
---
## 3. Software Platform
The solution is based on the Digital Legal Entity (DLE) platform: a microservices system with a web application for on-premises deployment.
Key components:
**Smart contracts with identifiers.** When registering, a company links regulator-defined identifiers to the smart contract: tax (TIN, EIN, etc.), accounting (industry codes), banking (BIC, SWIFT, IBAN), registration (company number, OGRN, ABN). All subsequent blockchain operations are tied to the identified entity.
**Blockchain registry (EVM-compatible).** Transaction and smart contract ledger for the jurisdiction. Deployed on local servers; data does not leave the territory.
**Blockchain scanner.** Tool for monitoring operations: search by transactions, addresses, company identifiers. Access for the supervisory body.
**AI agents.** Local language model (no cloud requests). Automation of analytics and reporting.
Platform source code is open — independent audit is possible.
---
## 4. Implementation Steps
| Stage | Content | Timeline |
|-------|---------|----------|
| 1. Preparation | Agree grant terms. Register fund presence. Obtain identifier lists. | 13 months |
| 2. Integration | Embed identifiers in platform. Deploy registry and scanner. Deploy first smart contract (fund presence). | 12 months |
| 3. Acceleration | Onboard participants. Companies register on platform, deploy smart contracts with identifiers. Supervisor gets scanner access. | from 3 months |
| 4. Operations | Maintain infrastructure. Expand participants and lines of business. Connect to registries of other jurisdictions. | ongoing |
Time to working infrastructure with first participants: **58 months**.
---
## 5. Outcomes for the Regulator
After implementation the supervisor obtains:
1. **Participant identification** — every entity working with digital assets in the jurisdiction is linked to national identifiers via smart contract.
2. **Monitoring tools** — blockchain scanner with access to the operations ledger in real time.
3. **A live sandbox** — a venue with real companies (accelerator participants), not an empty test environment.
4. **Cross-jurisdiction compatibility** — multi-chain architecture allows linking the registry to similar registries in other jurisdictions.
5. **Independence from external vendors** — infrastructure deployed on local servers, code open, data under regulators jurisdiction.
---
## 6. Data Security
| Requirement | Implementation |
|-------------|----------------|
| Data localization | On-premises deployment; data does not leave the jurisdiction |
| Encryption | TLS 1.3 (transport), AES-256 (storage) |
| AI component | Local model; no data transfer to third parties |
| Audit | Open source; possibility of review by supervisor |
| Compliance | GDPR, adaptation to local data protection requirements |
---
## 7. Contact
| | |
|---|---|
| Organization | VC HB3 Accelerator |
| Email | info@hb3-accelerator.com |
| Website | https://hb3-accelerator.com |
Additional materials on request:
[Accelerator program](accelerator-program.md) · [5-year roadmap](roadmap.md) · [Market analysis](market-analysis.md) · [Business model](business-model.md)
---
**Date:** 2026-02-19