Files
DLE/docs.en/case-vc-fund-traditional-vs-dle.md

6.6 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

English | Русский

Case: OpenAI on the DLE operating system

Essence

OpenAI — 900 million weekly users, 50 million paid subscribers, 9 million business customers, 170+ countries. Revenue $13 billion (2025). Valuation $840 billion.

Business model: cloud subscription $20/month (Plus), $200/month (Pro), $8/month (Go). Customers pay via bank cards, local payment systems, Apple Pay.

What if the customer buys not a subscription, but a token for the same $20 or $200 — and payments go through blockchain, not banks?

Same business model. Same prices. Same product. Only the settlement and governance infrastructure changes.


1. Payment infrastructure: 50 million subscribers × 170 countries

Traditional model (OpenAI today)

Cost item Details
Payment processor (Stripe) 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction (US), up to 3.9% + $0.30 international
Currency conversion +1% on each converted transaction
Local payment methods UPI (India), GoPay (Indonesia), Pix (Brazil), Kakao Pay (Korea) — separate integration per country
Disputes and chargebacks $15 per dispute + amount refund
Regional pricing Cancelled in 2025 — too hard to maintain different prices through the banking system
Restrictions Unavailable in China, Iran, and dozens of other countries. Workarounds: Apple Gift Cards ($26/month instead of $20)

Fee estimate on 50 million subscribers:

Plan Subscribers (estimate) Payment/month Fee ~3.5% Loss/year
Go ($8) 20,000,000 $8 $0.58 $139,200,000
Plus ($20) 25,000,000 $20 $1.00 $300,000,000
Pro ($200) 5,000,000 $200 $7.30 $438,000,000
Total 50,000,000 ~$877,000,000/year

Almost $900 million per year goes to banks and payment processors.

Tokenized model (DLE)

Cost item Details
Blockchain transaction $0.001$0.10 (Polygon, Solana, Tron)
Currency conversion Not needed — settlements in stablecoins (USDT/USDC)
Per-country integration Not needed — single protocol, works in any country
Disputes Terms in the smart contract, automatic refund
Restrictions None — access from any internet-connected location

Estimate:

Plan Subscribers Token/month Fee ~$0.01 Cost/year
Go ($8) 20,000,000 8 USDT $0.01 $2,400,000
Plus ($20) 25,000,000 20 USDT $0.01 $3,000,000
Pro ($200) 5,000,000 200 USDT $0.01 $600,000
Total 50,000,000 ~$6,000,000/year

Comparison

Banking infrastructure Blockchain
Transaction fee 2.93.9% + $0.30 $0.001$0.10 (fixed)
Cost for 50M subscribers ~$877,000,000/year ~$6,000,000/year
Savings $871,000,000/year
Country coverage 170 (with restrictions) Unlimited
Per-country integration Separate for each payment method Single protocol
Availability Unavailable in dozens of countries Available everywhere

2. Subscription management vs token management

Parameter Subscription (OpenAI) Token (DLE)
What the customer buys Access right for a month. Cancelled = access lost A license token. Owns it until sold or transferred
Recurring payments Monthly card charge, declines, delinquencies Customer buys a token when they want. No auto-charges
Resale Impossible Token can be sold or transferred to another user
Regional prices OpenAI cancelled discounts — too hard via banking Token price is uniform; a contributor may discount from their margin
Corporate customers Separate plans, contracts, invoices Bulk token purchase, no extra contracts
Accounting Subscription model — deferred revenue, complex accounting Token sale = completed on-chain transaction

3. Corporate structure

Parameter OpenAI (fact) On DLE
Legal structure Nonprofit → capped-profit → PBC. Changed 3 times. Lawsuits, investigations Company smart contract. Structure set at deploy
Raising $175 billion 20 rounds, lawyers, side letters, months of negotiation LPs buy governance tokens via the contract. Any amount, instantly
Minimum investor check $1 billion+ (latest rounds) $1,000 (1 token)
Board of directors Nov 2023 crisis: CEO fired, returned in 5 days On-chain voting. Decisions transparent and immutable
Financial transparency Private company. Data via press leaks All transactions on-chain. Token holders see everything
Conflict of interest Microsoft: $13B invested, 49% of profit, but no control Each investors rights are coded in the contract, proportional to share

4. Scaling to 170+ countries

Parameter OpenAI (fact) On DLE
Payment infrastructure Stripe (40 countries natively) + local providers. Separate integrations: UPI, GoPay, Pix, Kakao Pay Single smart contract. Works in any country
Legal presence Legal entities or offices in key countries Contributors in jurisdictions. No company legal entities required
Compliance Separate per jurisdiction: GDPR (Europe), RBI (India), PIPL (China) Data on the clients server. Compliance is on the clients side
Sanctions restrictions Unavailable in China, Iran, Russia, etc. Blockchain transactions do not depend on banking restrictions
Cost to enter a new market Lawyers, licenses, payment integration — $50K$500K per country Contributor + node install = VPS cost

5. What does not change

This case does not propose changing OpenAIs product. Models, training, R&D, compute — all stay.

What changes:

  • How the customer pays: token instead of bank subscription → ~$870M/year savings
  • How the company operates in 170 countries: single blockchain protocol instead of dozens of payment integrations
  • How governance works: transparent smart contract instead of 3 legal-structure changes in 9 years
  • How capital is raised: governance tokens instead of 20 lawyer-heavy rounds

What does not change:

  • Product (GPT, DALL·E, API)
  • Prices ($8, $20, $200)
  • Business model (subscription / usage-based)
  • Technology stack (models, inference, training)

Additional materials


Last updated: 2026-03-26